![]() ![]() ![]() But like I said, I have only messed with it once, and there may be ways to tweak it to work better. But doing things the 'old and slow' way will give you a slightly better/smaller end product. Now, all that said, with the little (like only once) I have played with quicksink I can tell you that while fast, it does export to a larger file size and of less quality than many other software/CPU encoders. The HD3000 has a technology called Quicksink, which is ridiculously fast at encoding/reincoding/transcoding video, and is leaps and bounds faster at encoding than even the GTX590 for that type of task, so really you WILL NOT see ANY performance improvement in rendering video by moving to a dedicated GPU. Even with those large GPUs it only speeds up the export time for SOME supported transitions and effects/color correction, and will not speed up the process of encoding regular plane-jane video. Video encoding is done on the CPU, or will be accelerated IF the software you use supports some GPU technologies (such as CUDA with Adobe Premiere), and even then it is only IF you have enough CUDA cores (think the GTX 480/570/580 which are rather expensive cards to begin with) to make it faster than the CPU encoding would be. Video encoding is simply not sped up by getting a better GPU. OK, here is some information that will help you out: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |